William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Blech. A: Of course it does. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. You can't just hope for the best. During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. She does play a large role in the movie and you can read all about her nonsense here. What the Bleep!? After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. We The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. That sounds like magic. Not everything is possible. Nobody does.". Where were we now? That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." IE 11 is not supported. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. Consciousness must be involved. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. 7. That's its claim anyway. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? He claims the drop was achieved. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. Next factoid: Crime in Washington, D.C. was reduced 25 percent by prayer--and made believers of the D.C. cops! This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. Our work isn't possible without your support. We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. Featured individuals [ edit] The film features interview segments of: Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. The quantum world does pervade everything around us, but as Richard Feynman liked to say, "Scientific creativity is imagination in a straitjacket." The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. Science Monitor has expired. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. So does classical physics. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. Moreover, assume that they want your money. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? It's there. D (k)ow!? Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. It is just a movie. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. If he says hes being misrepresented, I quite believe him. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo?

Es3 Save Editor, Articles W